Flawed methodology used by Mcgill retard

Canadian Universities Forum (discussion group)


 
 
Subject: Flawed methodology used by Mcgill retard
You see, you use the term "sucks". You could have used any other synonym.

Furthermore, there are more students (not only those studying at UofT) that care about UofT than for Mcgill.

Hence some York student could be like:

"Dude, Uoft sucks cause the chicks are not slutty like ours."

"dude, Uoft sucks cause they rejected me"

"dude, york sucks more than UofT"

blabla



[03-09-2006,01:17]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Flawed methodology used by Mcgill retard)
i hit a nerve
[03-09-2006,01:17]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Flawed methodology used by Mcgill retard)
^ you suck.

Don´t forget: "Uoft sucks good cock"

[03-09-2006,01:18]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Flawed methodology used by Mcgill retard)
uoft is a place, with buildings, how can it suck cocks?

are you mentally retarded?

[03-09-2006,01:19]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Flawed methodology used by Mcgill retard)
He meant when the students enter the buildings, uoft is sucking good cocks.

that implies uoft students have good cocks

on the other hand, mcgill doesn´t have that luxery

[03-09-2006,01:20]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Flawed methodology used by Mcgill retard)
I meant to say: luxury not luxery.


[03-09-2006,01:21]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Flawed methodology used by Mcgill retard)
^ go suck cock like they teach you.
[03-09-2006,01:26]
Anonymous
(in reply to: Flawed methodology used by Mcgill retard)
OP is jealous because s/he is not at McGill. Poor OP destined to suck cock.
[03-09-2006,01:28]
Anonymous



Canadian Universities Forum at Canada City Web Site | Start Home Based Business in Canada | Canadian and International FLP Business