STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?

Canadian Universities Forum (discussion group)


 
 
Subject: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?
IMO, they are really crushed by the reality that UofT has taken over.

Moreover, UBC have already passed them convincingly and Queen´s are also on their way.

So what can we do to help all these retarded losers? Should we just bomb the campus?

[24-08-2006,02:04]
Anonymous
(in reply to: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?)
http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=36514590&blogID=62077455
[24-08-2006,02:04]
Anonymous
(in reply to: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?)
"McGill sucks in that I´ve gotten DUMBER since coming here. I may complain about school a lot, but I actually do like learning. Sadly, most teachers can´t teach and most classes are BS, but when they do it well, I get stupid excited and just eat the stuff up"

http://chronicgospel.blogspot.com/2006/04/homosocialism-hong.html


[24-08-2006,02:06]
Anonymous
(in reply to: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?)
http://users.livejournal.com/_marlon_/2230.html
[24-08-2006,02:07]
Anonymous
(in reply to: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?)
You still have not told me how UofT has taken over McGill. Same with UBC. BTW, Queens´ is still consistently below McGill, UofT, UBC, U Alberta, U Montreal in all rankings. You have no case there. Most people think McGill is better. I provide you with solid arguments. All you have been able to say is McGill is on crack and you tell me that THES and Research Infosource is crap. Can´t you do better?
[24-08-2006,02:10]
Anonymous
(in reply to: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?)
http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/rank/2006/ARWU2006_Top100.htm

Did i say THES is crap? No.

[24-08-2006,02:12]
Anonymous
(in reply to: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?)
^ correction about Queen´s, below in THES.
[24-08-2006,02:12]
Anonymous
(in reply to: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?)
Actually inforsource says that Mcgill´s research is crap and doe snot get published as much as thta of Uoft and UBC.


[24-08-2006,02:12]
Anonymous
(in reply to: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?)
^ We´ve had this same debate a long time ago and McGill got killed. I don´t think anyone cares about McGill anymore to even put in the effort to argue again.
[24-08-2006,02:13]
Anonymous
(in reply to: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?)
"Actually inforsource says that Mcgill?s research is crap and doe snot get published as much as thta of Uoft and UBC."

Dude, don´t make things up. McGill professors publish more on average, check it out:

http://www.researchinfosource.com/RUY/2005/RUYMedicalAnalysis1.pdf

[24-08-2006,02:19]
Anonymous
(in reply to: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?)
http://www.researchinfosource.com/media/2006-5ETablesWeb.pdf
[24-08-2006,02:23]
Anonymous
(in reply to: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?)
http://www.researchinfosource.com/media/2005-top50-article.pdf
[24-08-2006,02:24]
Anonymous
(in reply to: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?)
hey, dumb mckid, that is old data and that is not the total output.
[24-08-2006,02:25]
Anonymous
(in reply to: STICKY: Discussion - Why McGill Kids are losers?)
http://www.researchinfosource.com/media/2005-top50-sup.pdf
[24-08-2006,02:26]
Anonymous



Canadian Universities Forum at Canada City Web Site | Start Home Based Business in Canada | Canadian and International FLP Business