UofT Faculty Capture Royal Society Awards, cont. 2

Canadian Universities Forum (discussion group)


 
 
Subject: UofT Faculty Capture Royal Society Awards, cont. 2
You dismiss Newsweek because you think endownment means everything, and you claim McGill deserves better with that shitty endowment?

BWAAHAHAHAHAHA

[24-08-2006,01:27]
Anonymous
(in reply to: UofT Faculty Capture Royal Society Awards, cont. 2)
McGill is a HAS-BEEN!

UBC is the new #2!

Everyone prepare yourself for McGill boy to copy and paste his propaganda!

[24-08-2006,01:35]
Anonymous
(in reply to: UofT Faculty Capture Royal Society Awards, cont. 2)
If you think UofT and UBC is better, I invite you to post your own reasons instead of saying that McGill is a has-been. Go on ...
[24-08-2006,01:38]
Anonymous
(in reply to: UofT Faculty Capture Royal Society Awards, cont. 2)
McGill, no money, no improvement.

If you don´t even understand this basic logic, you deserve to go to McGill.

[24-08-2006,01:41]
Anonymous
(in reply to: UofT Faculty Capture Royal Society Awards, cont. 2)
What the hell how are you talking? McGill no money? McGill may not have the endowment like UofT from rich Toronto bankers, but we do get lots of funding. According to Research Inforsource, the average McGill professor gets more funding than the average professor at any univerisity in Canada. Did you get that? Money directly funneled to researchers!
[24-08-2006,01:47]
Anonymous
(in reply to: UofT Faculty Capture Royal Society Awards, cont. 2)
ya, still, UofT gets more research $$ than McJill.
[24-08-2006,01:49]
Anonymous
(in reply to: UofT Faculty Capture Royal Society Awards, cont. 2)
Also, the fact that McGill professors on average are able to get more funding than professors at any other Canadian universities just shows how good McGill professors are. CIHR and NSERC are not idiots!
[24-08-2006,02:05]
Anonymous



Canadian Universities Forum at Canada City Web Site | Start Home Based Business in Canada | Canadian and International FLP Business