|
|
| Subject: to marielovesashley |
|
|
|
is the issue the conviction or is the issue that you are married and immigration as a matter of principle does not allow spouses to visit each other for fear they will remain in the country illegally. that is the very first question and one you are not really answering.
your problem is no different than anyone else trying to sponsor a spouse. Have you begun your sponsorship process yet? until you do... I am afraid the months you are apart will simply get longer.
Entry into the US... please explain to us why you are refused? it has nothing to do with your husbands conviction. why are you not posting your letters to Bush!
[11-07-2005,22:19]
[***.20.170.23]
sharon |
|
(in reply to: to marielovesashley)
Great questions! Ones I would love to see answered :-D
(or, perhaps she could post the letter from Karl Schwarz again, just to clarify, in case anyone missed it the first 20 times)
[11-07-2005,23:13]
[**.114.78.4]
FWChelle |
(in reply to: to marielovesashley)
Has your husband made application for Approval of Rehabilitation? If not, why are you whining on this forum. the rules are pretty clear. see below. your friend should read the rules too before he goes spouting off to government officials.
____________________________________
Persons who are inadmissaible to Canada
Members of Inadmissible Classes include those who have been convicted of MINOR OFFENCES (including shoplifting, theft, assault, dangerous driving, unauthorized possession of a firearm, possession of illegal substances, etc.), or of INDICTABLE CRIMINAL OFFENCES (including assault with a deadly weapon, manslaughter, etc.). As well, those who have been convicted of DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED (DWI) are considered Members of an Inadmissible Class. Driving while under the influence of alcohol is regarded as an extremely serious offence in Canada.
Those who have received TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS (including parking/speeding tickets, etc.) and other minor violations (i.e. littering, etc.) most likely will NOT be prohibited from entering Canada. Similarly, those who have JUVENILE CONVICTIONS (convictions for crimes committed while under age 18) most likely will NOT be prohibited from entering Canada unless they could have been tried as an adult for their offences.
TEMPORARY RESIDENT PERMIT, APPROVALS OF REHABILITATION, AND PERMISSION TO RETURN TO CANADA:
Those who have been convicted of an offence IN CANADA who wish to return to Canada must first apply for a PARDON from the CLEMENCY AND PARDONS DIVISION OF THE NATIONAL PAROLE BOARD. A Pardon permanently erases the Canadian criminal record, and any consequences of inadmissibility resulting from it. Those unable to obtain a pardon may still apply for a TEMPORARY RESIDENT PERMIT. For more information on pardons, contact:
NATIONAL PAROLE BOARD,
Clemency and Pardons Division,
340 Laurier Avenue West,
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1A 0R1.
Those who have been convicted of an offence OUTSIDE CANADA, and have had 5 years elapse since the termination of the custodial portion (if any) of the sentence imposed (not the sentence served), may apply for a Minister´s APPROVAL OF REHABILITATION. The Minister´s Approval will permanently remove the inadmissibility caused by conviction.
If less than 5 years have elapsed, or if persons are only seeking entry to Canada for a single or limited period, then they may apply for a TEMPORARY RESIDENT PERMIT.
Those subject of a previous DEPORTATION ORDER FROM CANADA require PERMISSION TO RETURN TO CANADA before they can enter Canada. As well, those who have been subject of an EXCLUSION ORDER within the past 12 months require Permission to Return to Canada before they can re-enter Canada.
**NOTE: In general, applications for Temporary Resident Permits, Approvals of Rehabilitation and Authorization to Return to Canada take into consideration the nature of the offenses committed by the applicant, the number of offenses on the applicant´s record, the length of time since the last offense, reports from parole or probation officers, the purpose for which entry into Canada is sought, and the applicant´s standing in the community.
[12-07-2005,01:32]
[***.20.170.23]
sharon |
(in reply to: to marielovesashley)
Let me tell ya this: Canada is simply a nut case of a country. It is far from being a civilized society.... I rest my case.
[12-07-2005,12:41]
[***.202.106.229]
ano |
The rules. Which rules? The law? Which law? (in reply to: to marielovesashley)
Sharon´s quote:
"If not, why are you whining on this forum. the rules are pretty clear".
The rules. Which rules? The law? Which law?
I am killing myself since the very beginning the Immigration border agent did not apply the AMENDED Immigration law on July 2004, Paragraph 36(2)(B) when my husband came on November 2004, i.e. 4 months after.
Question: Why to AMEND the Immigration laws if we are applying the OLD versions? This is insane. Nobody is answering that question, the VERY BASE of my problem.
Even if I would fill this rehabilitation thing, do you know what? The final decision is at the discretion of the Immigration border agent (according to the Immigration law) so if the border agent is not applying the Immigration law, guess what? I would pay for nothing. Mona Scott proved to me I can NOT trust an Immigration border agent in Canada.
Obviously, Sharon, you are on the side of the Immigration border agents, no matter if they are applying the Immigration laws or not, doesn´t matter.
The rules. Which rules? The law? Which law?
The rules of the powertrip. These rules are known worldwide.
The God of the bible is seing everything and according to His words, the people will reap what they have sown, sooner or later.
Martine Hamel, M.Ps.
Native French Canadian
[12-07-2005,13:24]
[**.12.116.5]
MarieLovesAshley |
(in reply to: to marielovesashley)
Quoting the bible isn´t going to get you anywhere. And why are you evading Sharon´s questions?
--------------------------------------------
Have you begun your sponsorship process yet?
Entry into the US... please explain to us why you are refused? it has nothing to do with your husbands conviction.
--------------------------------------------
I´ve been separated from my partner for over 2 years, but we´re plugging through the system, just like everyone else.
If your husband qualifies to apply for rehabilitation, then just do it. Everything has its process, and from what I can tell, nobody is exempt from them. Not even Native French Canadians with a Master in Psychology.
[12-07-2005,13:52]
[**.235.111.195]
FWChelle |
(in reply to: to marielovesashley)
FW Chelle, you are on Sharon´s side, no matter what.
IMMIGRATION LAWS are just applied by applicants. Not by Immigration border agents. Not from my own experience with Almighty Mona Scott.
It is Mona Scott who should apply for rehabilitation.
I am faithful to my husband and I have faith in the Creator of the Universe.
Ano´s quote:
"I think it would be a grave blunder for ANY American to invest in Canada in any technology. Please recognise that Canada has begun its descent into a terror haven through relentless and callous import of moslems from most corners of the world. It should surprise no onw if North America evolves to resemble South Asia, with the US resmbling India and Canada approximating Pakistan (with terror camps as the mainstay)... In such scenario, it is only a matter of time when Canada will FORCE the US to defend its national interests and launch a sweeping strike against Canada. So don?t invest... If anything, move to the good country next door..."
[09-07-2005,15:27]
ano
Am I understanding well, Ano...Mexico? I guess the processing would be more complicated because none of us are Native born Mexicans....so I wonder if it would be more complicate...
Martine Hamel
[12-07-2005,14:08]
[**.12.116.5]
marielovesashley |
(in reply to: to marielovesashley)
you spend so much time slamming people who take the time to rspond to your post you never have the courtesy to answer 3 simple questions which are at the root of all your posts.
1) why have you not begun the sponsorship process
2)why are you being declined entry by the US
3) why has your husband not applied for approval of rehabilitation.
2 out of 3 would solve your problem. You say ´what rules´ - the inadmissability rules are right on the CIC website for all to see.
Stop wasting your time and ours with all the literary mumbo jumbo and get on with what you need to do to resolve your situation. there is nothing more we can do here.
[12-07-2005,14:48]
[***.20.170.23]
sharon |
1,2,3 (in reply to: to marielovesashley)
1) The final decision is at the discretion of the Immigration border agent. Mona Scott did a mess and she is an Immigration border agent.
2) Need the visa to enter. You (in general) don´t even apply the Immigration laws in Canada properly so don´t even try to learn the Immigration laws in U.S. for now.
3) The final decision is at the discretion of the Immigration border agent. Mona Scott did a mess and she is an Immigration border agent.
Mona Scott is not doing her job properly so she should lose it. Period.
Adios amigos.
Martine Hamel
[12-07-2005,15:50]
[***.155.82.22]
marielovesashley |
(in reply to: to marielovesashley)
Just waiting Ano´s reply about his previous quote and thanking Jason again.
Martine Hamel
[12-07-2005,15:55]
[***.155.82.22]
marielovesashley |
(in reply to: to marielovesashley)
I thought it was a "Canadian Immigration Forum" here and I thought Immigration is going with the Immigration laws.
I guess it wasn´t the good place to truly and really consider the Immigration laws, especially the amended ones.
I just did not know it. Now, I know better.
Martine Hamel
[12-07-2005,16:06]
[***.155.82.22]
marielovesashley |
(in reply to: to marielovesashley)
Ok, so just keep screaming your head off for the next 2 years and spewing the bible and don´t even attempt to make the proper applications. I guarantee you´ll be in the same spot you are right now, nowhere.
I´m sorry to break it to you, but you haven´t the power nor ability to change policies or have anyone fired. Ain´t gonna happen.
And, this has nothing to do with taking sides. The facts speak for themselves. You´re blowing a lot of hot air in a lot of directions and getting yourself nowhere.
[12-07-2005,16:09]
[**.235.111.195]
FWChelle |
|
