|
|
| Subject: To DC |
|
|
|
Dear DC,
Regarding to your comment to Richard,
"When someone says I don?t agree with you then definitely deserve to know " where & why"? Just don?t agree with you doesn?t mean anything. I was born in "X", so can?t agree or making my point??? Sad. I can produce many Stats..reports..but didn?t get it. What does it mean? Then how can I make my point? By indicating my birth place? Is there any point to invoke personality clash?"
I want to step out of the last topic for a few minutes here. There is something more important to say.
I did not mean to offend you in any way shape or form, I just mentioned my place of birth so you can get to know me a little bit better nothing else no mean to offend you or anyone.
My sincerely apologies.
I will go back to your previous comments if you accept my apology.
Cheers
Bill
[25-01-2008,20:23]
[***.34.111.122]
Bill |
|
(in reply to: To DC)
Bill,
I also probably over reacted. My apology too. I should´ve simply asked you ´What´s your point" instead.
Anyway, we both understood each other, that´s the best thing. I already knew you, you are born American, currently working as an Engineer in Ft. Mcmurray in Gas/Oil field.
I usually find your writing very polite, sometimes with good humour, that´s why probably I lost myslef for a while. Had I got that someone instead then wouldn´t react in that way.
Thanks
[25-01-2008,21:35]
[**.152.223.169]
Departed_Canadian |
(in reply to: To DC)
Handshake
[26-01-2008,03:04]
[**.65.12.91]
Bill |
(in reply to: To DC)
Bill what exactly brings you to Canada? What exactly is pre-eminent in Canada for you personally than what you had in the US? I hope it wasn´t the bills or warrants back in the US that make Canada appealing. You need to come out of the shell and explain yourself. You owe this to yourself and staunch love for Canada. Let us hear it. I would love to hear some poor sod from the US come up here and see greatness.
[27-01-2008,20:36]
[***.202.38.47]
El Dorito |
(in reply to: To DC)
I´ve been trying to get Bill to be more revealing for quite a while too. He did give in and comment once on this recently, but I never did understand why he made the move.
(maybe he´s in the witness protection program - just kidding!)
[27-01-2008,22:36]
[**.53.225.236]
Richard |
(in reply to: To DC)
or maybe he fell in love with a Canuck or simply wanted to try something different.
I am assuming the recent political nonsense has you screaming in the night.
[27-01-2008,22:39]
[**.155.160.37]
Sharon |
(in reply to: To DC)
If you mean the middle east political commentaries. Yes.
[27-01-2008,23:35]
[**.53.225.236]
Richard |
(in reply to: To DC)
I was even thinking about the democratic infighting. How foolish.
[27-01-2008,23:39]
[**.155.160.37]
Sharon |
(in reply to: To DC)
Oh that, yes absolutely. Am especially disappointed in the Bill and Hillary tag team trying to instigate fights with Obama and doing anything no matter how low to get elected. I never saw that in Canadaian politics, despite huge party differences and disagreements.
[27-01-2008,23:45]
[**.53.225.236]
Richard |
(in reply to: To DC)
it can get stupid but when you are fighting your own ideology I begin to wonder about the entire exercise. If they keep it up I am afraid people will simply turn it off and vote republican again.
I am also wondering how Hillary thinks people will believe Bill will sit back and let her run the country.
all very disappointing.
[28-01-2008,00:12]
[**.155.160.37]
Sharon |
(in reply to: To DC)
BILL FOR VICE PRESIDENT LOL
[28-01-2008,08:30]
[**.52.219.22]
Roy |
