|
|
| Subject: Richard, about Buffalo 2 |
|
|
|
exactly! Buffalo becomes the application point for inland WP holders. If the applicant is lucky enough to navigate a PNP - that changes the process entirely, but from what I am ready... those opportunities are few and far between.
In-land applicants get into the same lineup as the US resident. I guess they thought the line/wait would never get so long.
What a mess. We have companies desperate for staff and we can´t seem to get the right skills here fast enough.
The stats Canada report that came out this week has sparked a lot of discussion. Lots of cries for a total overhaul. The skills we want are stuck in a line with skills we don´t really need and by the time it all gets sorted out, the country will be economically slowing down and the need will be over.
[09-12-2007,17:14]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon |
|
(in reply to: Richard, about Buffalo 2)
Well put, Sharon. This is what we were all trying to say. The upcoming Economic Class process should provide some relief for these immediate skills needs.
[09-12-2007,17:26]
[**.47.168.9]
Richard |
(in reply to: Richard, about Buffalo 2)
something has to give.
[09-12-2007,17:52]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon |
(in reply to: Richard, about Buffalo 2)
is your name Richard? my conversation was directed towards him - not to you.
[10-12-2007,00:05]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon |
(in reply to: Richard, about Buffalo 2)
Richard, you were asking about Balwant. We found him. If you noticed there are some postings missing from this thread - hence the odd thought trail.
There was a ID getting rather rude yesterday so I reported it to our administrator who suggested that the IP had been used by several people but they all used Balwant´s email as a reference. Searching the IP would suggest he is back in Georgetown.
The admin has blocked the IP so I guess he will need to find an internet cafe if he wants to participate any further.
For a guy who talked so much about integrity and professional conduct, I am less than impressed.
[10-12-2007,14:56]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon |
(in reply to: Richard, about Buffalo 2)
Sharon,
Could have been Balwant. But I personally don´t think so. Balwant didn´t often agree with comments and views here and his posts reflected that. But I never saw him stoop to that low of a level of those recent posts.
He was actually quite cordial and civil with good contributions here before leaving, I thought. I wonder if Roy still meets with him in Toronto.
In any event, glad to see those anonymous posts deleted.
[10-12-2007,15:34]
[**.47.168.9]
Richard |
(in reply to: Richard, about Buffalo 2)
well, I would like to agree with you but it is not reasonable to think that anyone else would use that very same computer and email as a contact. I guess we can assume he has an office full of employees on a router that now frequent this forum and use one email as a contact? Which one is tougher to believe?
Regrettably, I have also seen some of Mr. Persuads offline email directed my way that would suggest he is anything but civil.
When I talked to Roy about the Buffalo question he said he had not seen or heard from ´Bally´ for several weeks.
[10-12-2007,17:44]
[***.121.220.199]
Sharon |
|
