|
|
| Subject: R & M : Compassion should be common sense! |
|
|
|
R & M : The whole reason for this post is about compassion. She doesnt expect Canadian Taxpayers to pay for her child. She will pay taxes herself and raise the child if she is allowed to stay. Canadian tax payers will have to pay for the child if the woman is sent back. The woman might be trying to manipulate the immigration laws which is wrong but considering she be let to raise her child herself, she should be allowed to stay in Canada.
To remind you, this post is about Humanity and Compassion. Anyone could be in this situation. Just sit on the other side of the table and think.
If you are involved in an accident and stuck in your burning car, what should I do if I am passing by? Should I leave you to die or try to save you. This is where we show compassion as Human beings. If we think about dollars every moment of our lives, we will be no different than animals.
[15-04-2007,05:20]
[***.187.168.3]
Almost Perfect!! |
|
(in reply to: R & M : Compassion should be common sense!)
Almost Perfect thank you for your logical and kind words.
THE MAIN ISSUE IS THAT WE HAVE HAD A HUMANITARIAN AND COMPASSIONATE APPLICATION WITH IMMIGRATION FOR A YEAR ALREADY. THEY WILL NOT EVEN LOOK AT HONG ZHANG´S AND HER DAUGHTER SHERRY´S APPLICATION FOR ANOTHER YEAR. IN THEORY IF THEY LOOK AT IT A YEAR AFTER CBSA CANADA BORDER SERVICE AGENCY REMOVES HER THEY COULD BRING HER BACK.
THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE WOULD FIND IT ALOT EASIER JUST TO REFUSE HER THEN TRY TO FIND HER IN CHINA TO BRING HER BACK. SHE HAS TWO OPTIONS TAKE THE CHILD WITH HER OR LEAVE HER BEHIND. THE ISUE IS THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD A CANADIAN AND IS THIS SOMETHING THAT MOST CANADIANS WOULD SHOW COMPASSION FOR?
ROY
AND HELL YES I´M ANGRY
[15-04-2007,11:47]
[**.55.216.205]
Roy |
|
